One of my team members asked an intriguing question last week – why is the federal government bailout been given only to those Banks and Investment Banks, but not for automobiles sector? Sounds logical; if we look internally, both Banks and Auto companies are asking for bailout plans, not to offer new products or new system; they just want to pay off the debts and payments. GM alone needs $10 billion to pay for its bills and another $6 billion to run its plant.
Let’s have a countering view for Banks and Autos.
The banks have collapsed just because of the greedy Investment bankers, who engineered and re engineered the whole Sub Prime papers and are now highly paid in the system.
The Automobile makers did not do any bad investment, but was just hit by the lowered demand which can even be attributed to those Investment bankers, who literally drained up the money.
The Big Three automobile manufacturers (General Motors, Ford and Chrysler) directly employ about 240,000 people. But each car makers has their own suppliers and small component suppliers who supply parts only to these companies. (Recently you would have heard the news of suppliers also moved out of Singur, once TATAs pulled out.) A recent survey shows around 4000 medium or Tier 1 supplier units employ around 974,000 people.
Let’s have a quick economics here.
Total automobile & related activity workers – 1.2 million
Now to take care the needs of any individual the society needs Doctors, lawyers, Groceries, Shopping, Entertainment, hotels, tourism, FMCG, clothing companies and everything.
So, as a whole, indirectly another million people will be dependent on these 1.2 million workers.
Add to them their family members. As an average let us take there is at least one dependant on every employed person. (If it is India, it would be a huge multiple factorJ ), so we get another 2.4 million.
So if GM/Chrysler/Ford file for bankruptcy, around 5 million people will be left with no source of income.
But the same time, the Investment bankers are very less in number (might be, that’s what they make it their USP). Their bank going bankrupt and they getting their jobs axed will not affect a large group of people, and even schools have taught us that Thou sinners shall be punished. J
But on the other side, if banks collapse, the impact will be very high in all parts of the economy.
1) First, the depositors/Investors will lose money.
2) There will not be any source of lending for any company /Industry to run. It means all industries to get locked down and follow bankruptcy route along with banks.
Think of a situation, you need a lac of rupee for an urgent requirement, but there is no lender. Your stomach feels cramping? That is what will happen if banks are not saved from bankruptcy, in any economy and particularly in US where there is negligible household savings.
Yes, when, these automobile companies are filing for bankruptcy, there will be a huge blow on the salaried middle class sector, which forms huge proportions of the society, also the retirees of the auto companies. Their retirement benefits would go in for a toss from the contribution to be made by the companies (but would be covered by Pension Benefit Guarantee Corp).
Even if the government bails out the auto majors, they will still be forced to do the restructuring. Cutting down costs, shutting down few plants and lots of job losses. Also the bailout comes from none other than taxpayer’s money, which will be splashed at the cost of their prosperity. That’s why the government is still hesitant to bailout Auto mobile companies because spending Tax payers money for a bank will yield more productivity in terms of Money supply, industrial activity and in turn consumer spending. But putting taxpayer’s money into auto companies will not increase the demand of the cars nor will it boost the consumer spending and economic turnaround. It might save the jobs for another three or four months for the companies to restructure their plans and plants, but again for the automobile companies to flourish, there need to be a demand created in the market, which could only be driven by banks.
It is just like what Edward Lorentz[1] had perceived, the near bankruptcy levels of GM or Chrysler might have been caused by the guy who lived in the 3rd street of a remote area in San Antonio, and featured in the list of defaulters by WaMu bank[2].
[1] Edward Lorentz- Father of Chaos Theory and Butterfly Effect.
[2] WaMu- Washington Mutual- A Leading Mortgage lender, and off late bailed out by JP Morgan Chase.